« Thèse:Résumé » : différence entre les versions

Aller à la navigation Aller à la recherche
Aucun résumé des modifications
Ligne 29 : Ligne 29 :


<span id="ancre_3"></span>
<span id="ancre_3"></span>
==THE CINEMANTIC (english version)==
==THE CINEMANCY (english version)==


Cinemantic (or cine-divination) is a theory over cinema and societies.  The term cinemantic, is a neologism who come from, kiné, the movement, and mantic, (the greek term, mantiké,) divination.  However, cinemantic is not an esoteric discipline, because it outcome exclusively from the image of a film. It will allow us to disclose some new epistemology.  Very early, we observed that this research have a large site.  Thus, the present thesis is only a sketch that we don't want to interrupt.
Cinemancy (or cine-divination) is a theory over cinema and societies.  The term cinemancy, is a neologism who come from, kiné, the movement, and mantic, (the greek term, mantiké,) divination.  However, cinemantic is not an esoteric discipline, because it outcome exclusively from the image of a film. It will allow us to disclose some new epistemology.  Very early, we observed that this research have a large site.  Thus, the present thesis is only a sketch that we don't want to interrupt.


This sketch is dividing in three volumes.  The first two volumes privileged the poetic cinema of Andreï Tarkovski (1932-1986) for different reasons : care, invention and choice of peculiar subjects and objects ; simple and sober presentation of a complex emotion ; a remarkable cinematographic techniques ; and a vision  of an art who is oriented deeply in contemporary human preoccupation. Etc. The third volume, at last, is a project of a cinemantic dictionary, in which we approach other filmmaker like Bergman I., Bresson R., Buñuel L., Bertolucci B., etc.
This sketch is dividing in three volumes.  The first two volumes privileged the poetic cinema of Andreï Tarkovski (1932-1986) for different reasons : care, invention and choice of peculiar subjects and objects ; simple and sober presentation of a complex emotion ; a remarkable cinematographic techniques ; and a vision  of an art who is oriented deeply in contemporary human preoccupation. Etc. The third volume, at last, is a project of a cinemantic dictionary, in which we approach other filmmaker like Bergman I., Bresson R., Buñuel L., Bertolucci B., etc.

Menu de navigation